Is Solar Power really Green ?
Sunshine Hours
Most countries do not have very high average sunshine hours.
As an example, Melbourne is supposed to have 2373 hours of sunshine a year and an average of 7 hrs a day. But the statistics are lies, because Melbourne only has 4 sunshine hours in Winter[1].
Auckland has only 2000 hrs a year, that sounds great [2], but it only has 110 hours in June or 3.6 hours a day[3].
Wind Turbines do not generate power when it is very still or moderately windy. So you need storage. The most economical option is Lithium batteries. This is still not cheap.
Storage Is Needed for Payback
For most alternate power sources require storage. Without adequate storage, the current existing generation from hydro, fossil fuels and nuclear has to continue. Fossil fuel and Nuclear powered generators generally require days to start up. Huntly (in NZ) requires 3 days to start up. This means that fossil fuel based generation has to be kept on standby.
Does it make sense that we have to carry on with the current production of power for normal use, while ramping this "dirty" generation up to manufacture the so called Green alternatives ?
Total cost
If you consider the total cost from manufacturing to usage to dumping, then Solar and Wind generation can't possibly be Green. The mining of Silicon, Germanium and Lithium[4] is a filthy process. The life cycle of the products is short, between 5 and 10 years[5]. After that they have to be dumped. It is true that these items CAN be recycled. But most countries are unable to recycle the solar panels[6], broken wind generators[7] and used up lithium batteries[8].
Conclusion
So ask yourself, why are they touted as Green and why are we persisting with this foolishness. In fact, going to these technologies is just using increased amounts of fossil fuels and increasing the emission of gases we are trying to reduce.
Should we be reducing usage of fossil fuels ? Absolutely. But that does not automatically make Solar and Wind "Green". I have Solar Power in my house. But not because it is going to save the Earth. I have it, in case the lunatics drag us back to the stone-age. As a benefit, it now has a reasonable payback period, so over a period of 10 years, it will save me money. But it is not Green.- Above are my views based on my personal experience and my interactions with leading scientists and real-life observers of events.
- If you spot any errors in fact or deduction, please send me a note so that I can correct this piece.
- If you have an opposing viewpoint, let me know with facts or even reasoned arguments and I will update this essay.
- How do you tell the difference between a believer in science and a believer in religion.